Jump to content

Adblock Detected

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.

St Mirren Highlights


Dondeh

Recommended Posts

Adblock Detected

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.
  • Replies 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Pretty much clears everything up. No way of telling if it was offside really but looks more on than off in the freeze frame so linesman got it right for me, would have been disappointed if it had been given off :rolleyes:

Harkins' challenge in first minute was a foul and no more, Smurren fans looking for a booking are away wi' it.

Davo's challenge on Arquin was clumsy and probably should have been a penalty - but Bain would have saved it so what the hey?

First booking for Arquin was a deliberate foul and worth a booking, the second was him falling over his own feet - comical.

They're absolute rubbish in front of goal.

Excellent three points now bring on Hamilton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Deeranged stated, they are rubbish in front of goal..............just as well.

We are poor at defending corners and set piece play when crosses come into the box, Mcpake, who I think is a braw player and has been a great signing for us needs to be more commanding at crosses, I also feel there seems to be a lack of communication as to who is meant to be marking who sometimes. However a great result yesterday, and now looking forward to challenging to get into top 6.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering St.Mirren appear to be a bit upset & paranoid about the "controversies" in their last 3 games, it was good to hear Steven Thomson say on Sportscene tonight that Irvine was definitely onside. He might have some trouble convincing his manager at training on Monday, though!

With no better camera angle, BBC's wee graphic with the line parallel with the edge of the 6-yard box clarified that although Stewart's pass was played slightly forward, Irvine was just onside of him, not even level....linesman was absolutely correct.

There was no view of the red card incident that helped in any way, and the ref was very close to it. They didn't show the Davidson challenge that some have said looked a pen, nor the incident where he was injured. 

The officials in the Arabs game, though.....now that really was controversial  :huh: Motherwell denied two clear penalties, though the "no-goal" seemed a correct decision (just a bit of a shambles between ref & linesman)....so quite a good day for us, really.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adblock Detected

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Adblock Detected

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.


×
×
  • Create New...