Jump to content

Adblock Detected

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.

McCann's Ban


Edin_Dee

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, DeeVDee said:

Because it has happened in the past that ban's have been extended, it may not but why take the risk

Im just saying under what conditions in a ban extended? Plenty of clubs appeal, usually to avoid missing a specific game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adblock Detected

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.
5 minutes ago, Blue4evr said:

Im just saying under what conditions in a ban extended? Plenty of clubs appeal, usually to avoid missing a specific game.

If the SFA deem the appeal frivolous. The link below isn't the case i was thinking of where a ban was extended however it is what they could use to extend a ban

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/celtic-skipper-scott-brown-could-10239747

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Densparker said:

I think that because Terry got the same punishment as the Fermer who really instigated this fracas was the big issue!

Clark's punishment was 4 games but because he pled guilty, even though Wright said his team had no part in it, it was reduced to 2. Absolute farce. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there's genuinely an advantage in NM being on the touchline, then I'd have thought the 5 post-split games were the crucial ones for him? If he loses the appeal before the Celtic game, fine, he's in the stand for the 2 OF games.

At Dens, he'd have been about 25 yards from the dugout, and with a mobile phone to talk to Gartland, and with a slightly better view of the game.....not really a big deal, surely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, WoodStein said:

If there's genuinely an advantage in NM being on the touchline, then I'd have thought the 5 post-split games were the crucial ones for him? If he loses the appeal before the Celtic game, fine, he's in the stand for the 2 OF games.

At Dens, he'd have been about 25 yards from the dugout, and with a mobile phone to talk to Gartland, and with a slightly better view of the game.....not really a big deal, surely.

That's my take too, I don't get it but I suppose egos have to be considered too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Wonder if it will make any difference on Saturday. McCann has been on the sidelines for nine games at Dens this season against bottom six sides and we've lost seven of them. Maybe him sitting in the stand isn't such a bad thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Cobra said:

Wonder if it will make any difference on Saturday. McCann has been on the sidelines for nine games at Dens this season against bottom six sides and we've lost seven of them. Maybe him sitting in the stand isn't such a bad thing.

I can understand why NM wants to be in the dugout but come on, this isn't the dark ages, I've heard of these wonderful devices called mobile phones (they'll never catch on) that allow a person to communicate with another person over distance...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adblock Detected

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...