Jump to content
The Dark Blues

Spfl

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

Rangers are asking for a meeting with all 42 Scotttish clubs,  with several items on the agenda.  They are also asking questions re Dundee FC vote fiasco etc etc, this could get messy for the SPFL if Rangers get the clubs to agree to a meeting.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Partick Thistle might want it or Falkirk who have been shafted. I think it deserves this and the actions of Dundee FC should be looked at. 

Also on Sportsound, some MP with an apparently obvious leaning towards a particular club, seems to have tabled a motion in parliament in support of this proposed investigation. Beggars belief. As

Rangers are asking for a meeting with all 42 Scotttish clubs,  with several items on the agenda.  They are also asking questions re Dundee FC vote fiasco etc etc, this could get messy for the SPFL if

11 hours ago, thegen65 said:

Rangers are asking for a meeting with all 42 Scotttish clubs,  with several items on the agenda.  They are also asking questions re Dundee FC vote fiasco etc etc, this could get messy for the SPFL if Rangers get the clubs to agree to a meeting.

They only need another 2 to force a further review. Presumably Hearts will be onside so just 1 more. In some ways we need one, but will it paint us as even more the bad guy?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am hoping Dundee support this. Its really needed to be able to properly move on from this and confirm one way or another whether anything corrupt has gone on. 

The SPFL’s secret “independent” investigation was laughable and just raises more concerns. 

If what Dundee say happened actually happened then they will support this. If not then it will only confirm what most fans already believe. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, HK Blues said:

They only need another 2 to force a further review. Presumably Hearts will be onside so just 1 more. In some ways we need one, but will it paint us as even more the bad guy?

Partick Thistle might want it or Falkirk who have been shafted. I think it deserves this and the actions of Dundee FC should be looked at. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, HK Blues said:

They only need another 2 to force a further review. Presumably Hearts will be onside so just 1 more. In some ways we need one, but will it paint us as even more the bad guy?

It is saying on the radio they require 32 out of the 42 clubs to force an inquiry.

Highly unlikely they will get this backing.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, BigG said:

It is saying on the radio they require 32 out of the 42 clubs to force an inquiry.

Highly unlikely they will get this backing.

32 needed? I wonder why Rangers are wasting their time.

85% of clubs voted in favour of the SPFL's horrible plan so clearly the vast majority of clubs don't care much about integrity as long as they're getting a handout or in our case the promise of a convo about reconstruction.

Maybe Rangers are just thinking about keeping the fans onside and selling season tickets.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also on Sportsound, some MP with an apparently obvious leaning towards a particular club, seems to have tabled a motion in parliament in support of this proposed investigation.

Beggars belief. As Michael Stewart commented, why was this guy even allowed airtime?

  • Like 1
  • Star Post 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Cobra said:

32 needed? I wonder why Rangers are wasting their time.

85% of clubs voted in favour of the SPFL's horrible plan so clearly the vast majority of clubs don't care much about integrity as long as they're getting a handout or in our case the promise of a convo about reconstruction.

Maybe Rangers are just thinking about keeping the fans onside and selling season tickets.

Got it in one Cobra.

Rangers are only ever interested in playing to their own support and seemingly now more than ever.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, BigG said:

It is saying on the radio they require 32 out of the 42 clubs to force an inquiry.

Highly unlikely they will get this backing.

Yeah - I misread the original report.  It needs 3 clubs for an issue to be raised at the meeting, and then 75% required to force an inquiry. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.