Jump to content
The Dark Blues

Seemingly

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

The gaffer knows cw as well as anyone - happy to let him decide if he’s interested or not 

For me Wighton's had his chance at the cub he's supported all his life and, he didn't exactly set the heather alight. One or two moments of magic over two or three seasons aren't enough. If the o

We are in an agricultural league 

1 hour ago, Deeboy08 said:

On hearts kickback forum wighton and someone else are getting their contracts terminated 

For me Wighton's had his chance at the cub he's supported all his life and, he didn't exactly set the heather alight. One or two moments of magic over two or three seasons aren't enough.

If the other one is a certain centre half that's a different story.

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DarkBlueKnight said:

The gaffer knows cw as well as anyone - happy to let him decide if he’s interested or not 

Agree with that if he thinks he can get more out of him than Hartley, the disaster Mk I or the disaster Mk II.

Otherwise, best left well alone.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Prince Buster said:

Agree with that if he thinks he can get more out of him than Hartley, the disaster Mk I or the disaster Mk II.

Otherwise, best left well alone.

We’ve had way more disasters than Mk I and Mk II  PB - stop being so positive !!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, DarkBlueKnight said:

We’ve had way more disasters than Mk I and Mk II  PB - stop being so positive !!

That is possibly true DBK. However we've never really had two successive totally disastrous managerial appointments like that pair. Replacing a fud with a diddy could have cost us the club.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Prince Buster said:

That is possibly true DBK. However we've never really had two successive totally disastrous managerial appointments like that pair. Replacing a fud with a diddy could have cost us the club.

I think fud slightly harsh and diddy seriously not harsh enough ! 

  • Funny 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, DarkBlueKnight said:

The gaffer knows cw as well as anyone - happy to let him decide if he’s interested or not 

We require a Big Target man up front, to hold the Ball up,  we have just signed Two players, very simular to Craig, we just can't have another season, like the last one, when the Ball Never stayed up front and always came backwards, from our single Striker up front, this has to change, it didn't work last season, hence, the POOR, amount of goals scored.

Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Rocky Boy said:

We require a Big Target man up front, to hold the Ball up,  we have just signed Two players, very simular to Craig, we just can't have another season, like the last one, when the Ball Never stayed up front and always came backwards, from our single Striker up front, this has to change, it didn't work last season, hence, the POOR, amount of goals scored.

Not a fan of the target man approach. Agricultural :)

Edited by eyeothedug
Link to post
Share on other sites

Its a no from me, never strung together more than about 2 good performances. Look at young Fin, just about our best player every week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.