Rocket Science

[Smiffy1]

1. Legzdins

2. French

3.Kerr

4.Ashcroft 

5.McGhee

 

6.Grayson

8.Byrne

 

7.Mcmullan

10. Gowser

11.Mulligan

 

9. Robinson

 

4 -2-3-1

 

 

 

[charliedee]

i'd go with that except i'd still play marshall before kerr at left back..for years boys have been wanting kerr dropped/punted/sold yet suddenly we have a better right back than him and boys want him moved to the left he seems to get better the less he plays 

[Smiffy1]

I rate Kerr.

Our support booed kamara.

Marshall too weak defensively for me

 

[Notso]

12 minutes ago, Smiffy1 said:

I rate Kerr.

Our support booed kamara.

Marshall too weak defensively for me

Can’t remember Kamara getting booed , but I do agree Cammy is a better option at left back than Marshall 

[BigG]

Argument could be made for McCowan instead of McMullan.

[Smiffy1]

Just now, BigG said:

Argument could be made for McCowan instead of McMullan.

Or Williamson for Grayson.....

 

Don't really rate either but could sit with Byrne.

[BigG]

1 minute ago, Smiffy1 said:

Or Williamson for Grayson

Williamson has done nothing in a Dundee shirt to suggest he gets a game. I watched him when he played for Arbroath  and looked a right good player, had everything. All you can say in a Dundee shirt is that he looks tidy but offers nothing. Grayson not exactly bossing it either mind you.!

[Blue4evr]

1 hour ago, charliedee said:

i'd go with that except i'd still play marshall before kerr at left back..for years boys have been wanting kerr dropped/punted/sold yet suddenly we have a better right back than him and boys want him moved to the left he seems to get better the less he plays 

You obviously dislike Kerr with a vengeance.  You wrote exactly the same ditty about getting better the less he plays a few days ago. Even adding the same silly emoji!  Don't see a rush of people agreeing with you, just the opposite. 

[charliedee]

9 minutes ago, Blue4evr said:

You obviously dislike Kerr with a vengeance.  You wrote exactly the same ditty about getting better the less he plays a few days ago. Even adding the same silly emoji!  Don't see a rush of people agreeing with you, just the opposite. 

i really dont care if people agree with me...as for disliking him with a vengeance away you go...read numerous threads on here and you'll see that there are numerous posts saying he shouldn't be playing for us...yet here we are a thread wanting him played out of position..its amusing...his left foot is about as good as mine so why the hell would you want him playing left back 

[Valentke]

8 minutes ago, Blue4evr said:

You obviously dislike Kerr with a vengeance.  You wrote exactly the same ditty about getting better the less he plays a few days ago. Even adding the same silly emoji!  Don't see a rush of people agreeing with you, just the opposite. 

I’ll agree that Marshall is a better left back than Cammy. Not much but the fact he is on his natural side gives him the edge for me. 

[charliedee]

3 minutes ago, Valentke said:

I’ll agree that Marshall is a better left back than Cammy. Not much but the fact he is on his natural side gives him the edge for me. 

the way the modern fullback is expected to play i think marshall is a better player than what we think

i want my defenders to be able to defend but thats not the way the game is played now...fullbacks are expected to bomb forward and whip balls into the box

 

[BigG]

4 hours ago, charliedee said:

the way the modern fullback is expected to play i think marshall is a better player than what we think

i want my defenders to be able to defend but thats not the way the game is played now...fullbacks are expected to bomb forward and whip balls into the box

We play with wide men so is there any need for Kerr and Marshall to push so high up the pitch! Agree with defenders defending as a priority, if you don't concede you will certainly pick up more points than others.