Glen Kamara

[Smokiedee]

See Rangers are wanting £5 million for him.

Are we still due any part of it ?

[tommy the tap in king]

2 minutes ago, Smokiedee said:

See Rangers are wanting £5 million for him.

Are we still due any part of it ?

IMcIntyre insisted on a 75% sell on fee

[J_Kitamirike]

What has happened to him btw?

He was one of Rangers star players for a while and linked to big money moves.

Looks like he's completely out of favour since the new manager has come in. Performances dipped too?

[Smokiedee]

22 minutes ago, tommy the tap in king said:

IMcIntyre insisted on a 75% sell on fee

If only, it might kick start New Campy

[dblair]

Not sure if it’s based on pure assumption or if someone actually knew that there wasn’t any clause due to the nature of the situation at the time, but I’ve always hoped that there may be some (if small) percentage due

[darkbluecheshire]

Doubtful, McI wanted rid of him and took the 45k (i think it was for him to join them), sure he said he didn't want distractions in the team at the time. we took that and got Ethan Robertson and Scott Wright on loan.

[Billy Campbell's Ghost]

Another Nelms abomination, that and Bain

[dfcman]

Kamara  was never interested in playing for us.Obviously had talent but was totally unprofessional .

[dblair]

12 minutes ago, Billy Campbell's Ghost said:

Another Nelms abomination, that and Bain

No sure you can blame nelms for 1. The players head being turned by mega bucks and 2. McIntyre deciding he could bring in better to replace him

[J_Kitamirike]

15 minutes ago, Billy Campbell's Ghost said:

Another Nelms abomination, that and Bain

Bain? That arrogant pr*ck can do one.

Was no loss to us either.

[thewhitefeather]

No sell on clause unfortunately as Kamara had signed a pre-contract and the 50k was to fund the McIntyre 'war-chest'

[TC86]

29 minutes ago, dblair said:

Not sure if it’s based on pure assumption or if someone actually knew that there wasn’t any clause due to the nature of the situation at the time, but I’ve always hoped that there may be some (if small) percentage due

I thought at the time of the move that it was mentioned that there was a sell on clause .

That may just be the passage of time that has mixed that up in my head but since then all the chat has been that there was no sell on clause so ive always assumed there wasn't one.

 

if everyone is correct and we didn't insist on at least 10% sell on then it is up there with the very worst bits of business our club has ever allowed to happen regardless if he was leaving for nothing at end of the season .