Jump to content

Adblock Detected

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.

Kevin Thomson


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, CC33 said:

Whats the point if i told you he was between 2/3 k a week you prob wouldnt believe me.
What are you getting at asking me what money he was on.

Everythings a fking drama with some.

Fact is he shouldnt have been
A-Captain
B - Highest paid player

No, not a fact just an opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adblock Detected

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.
34 minutes ago, CC33 said:

Riorden must look back and kick himself - fantastic player who threw it away acting like billy big time
Least KT earned good money where he`s been and im no just meaning Dundee ;)

Totally agree re-Riordan. Must have a frustrating player to watch and coach. There's a lot of distractions for young blokes earning 4 or 5 times what their mates are earning and probably too easy to get lost if there's not a lot of guidance. Riordan, O'Connor and Tam McManus would've been some strike force.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Reverend Lovejoy said:

Totally agree re-Riordan. Must have a frustrating player to watch and coach. There's a lot of distractions for young blokes earning 4 or 5 times what their mates are earning and probably too easy to get lost if there's not a lot of guidance. Riordan, O'Connor and Tam McManus would've been some strike force.

 
 
 

Hibs team:
 

              GK

Whittaker Caldwell Murray Stevenson

             Brown Thomson

      McManus           Riordan

             Fletcher O'Connor

I'm pretty sure Jamie McCluskey looked like he was going to be a star too.

Edited by harry94
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Derry Drummer said:

Whatever he was on it was too much to be sitting in the stand. Thats the bottom line. 

 

Thing is though DD Thomson appears to be getting singled out because of what he is alleged to have earned. We've got loads of players every season sitting in the stand and picking up a wage but who duck under the radar of those who seek to pedal rumours and cause disharmony.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CC33 said:

Whats the point if i told you he was between 2/3 k a week you prob wouldnt believe me.
What are you getting at asking me what money he was on.

Everythings a fking drama with some.

Fact is he shouldnt have been
A-Captain
B - Highest paid player

Doubt Hartley would have got him to Dens in that case.

We were well warned in advance of what to expect from Kevin Thomson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Reverend Lovejoy said:

Thing is though DD Thomson appears to be getting singled out because of what he is alleged to have earned. We've got loads of players every season sitting in the stand and picking up a wage but who duck under the radar of those who seek to pedal rumours and cause disharmony.

Simon Ferry was on to much. Roberts was on too much. Tank too much etc etc. If you started a topic about Roberts i would call him a waste and say he was paid to much. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Derry Drummer said:

Simon Ferry was on to much. Roberts was on too much. Tank too much etc etc. If you started a topic about Roberts i would call him a waste and say he was paid to much. 

Hindsight is a wonderful thing though DD. Its a bit tight to call all the players who were disappointing a waste of a wage AFTER they were disappointing, the tricky bit is to call it BEFORE we sign them. Get that right and you're a long way to being a great manager.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Derry Drummer said:

Simon Ferry was on to much. Roberts was on too much. Tank too much etc etc. If you started a topic about Roberts i would call him a waste and say he was paid to much. 

We've got a first team squad of around 25 players. Not all of them can play, some will be benched but some will sit in the stand. They wont be getting slated and have their finances the talk of the steamie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Reverend Lovejoy said:

We've got a first team squad of around 25 players. Not all of them can play, some will be benched but some will sit in the stand. They wont be getting slated and have their finances the talk of the steamie.

The squad's looking like it'll be a wee bit bigger than PH indicated, but with our injury record, I think that's fine, especially as a few are young players, and presumably will get games in the U-20's/Cols/whatever "reserves" are going to be called this season.

I'm curious....is that last sentence a personal statement of intent, Rev, or a wider prediction? Can't imagine you use the steamie :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Reverend Lovejoy said:

We've got a first team squad of around 25 players. Not all of them can play, some will be benched but some will sit in the stand. They wont be getting slated and have their finances the talk of the steamie.

But players being benched or put in stand due to performance isn't a problem. 

 

Being a sick note is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adblock Detected

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...