£186,000 fine for pitch.

[DFC1974]

Ouch

edit to add.: £120k of it suspended until next season. Still painful though. 

[Ludo*1]

I can't really see that standing up in court. The £120k is payable if we have a single postponement due to a waterlogged pitch next season - even if we sort our pitch - that's just laughable.

As for the television costs of £36,429.60, that can get in the bin.

It's no surprise to see we're pursuing legal advice.

[gblue]

Phucking ridiculous 

[dblair]

2 minutes ago, Ludo*1 said:

I can't really see that standing up in court. The £120k is payable if we have a single postponement due to a waterlogged pitch next season - even if we sort our pitch - that's just laughable.

As for the television costs of £36,429.60, that can get in the bin.

It's no surprise to see we're pursuing legal advice.

Absolute joke the £120k if we have just one postponement next season. 

[TheDarkBlues]

6 minutes ago, dblair said:

Absolute joke the £120k if we have just one postponement next season. 

The SPFL just make it up as they go along.

I hope that we take this to court and win.

[charliedee]

Bit fu*king steep .. we'll appeal and it will get halved ...still it's a lot of money 

[gblue]

Yep we have to appeal phuck them

[Gull83]

What a load of sh*t 

[nemsadzDEE]

The SPFL pandering to Rangers as usual. At least we got our moral victory last night. 

The club definitely need to challenge that as it's a complete joke basing it on 1 call off as that is outwith what the club can reasonably control. 

[Sinkie]

So works out at 30k per game as wasn't one called off by the police and nothing to do with the pitch.

Motherwell fined 60k suspended for same thing .

Theirs wasn't carried over too the next season .

Is that now going  too be the standard then or is it just for Dundee .

Same as the administration points deduction .

[Daniel Watson]

6 minutes ago, nemsadzDEE said:

The SPFL pandering to Rangers as usual. At least we got our moral victory last night. 

The club definitely need to challenge that as it's a complete joke basing it on 1 call off as that is outwith what the club can reasonably control. 

Rangers say to the SPFL sh*t and the SPFL say how much and which bucket would you like it in.

[Daniel Watson]

32 minutes ago, Ludo*1 said:

I can't really see that standing up in court. The £120k is payable if we have a single postponement due to a waterlogged pitch next season - even if we sort our pitch - that's just laughable.

As for the television costs of £36,429.60, that can get in the bin.

It's no surprise to see we're pursuing legal advice.

It would probably cost more than £120k to go to court. It’s galling when the club are committed to building a new stadium, when did that last happen in Scottish football? I was foolish enough to think that one of the SPFL’s functions was to nurture clubs and help them develop.